↓ Skip to main content

Planning adaptation to climate change in fast-warming marine regions with seafood-dependent coastal communities

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
Title
Planning adaptation to climate change in fast-warming marine regions with seafood-dependent coastal communities
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11160-016-9419-0
Authors

Alistair J. Hobday, Kevern Cochrane, Nicola Downey-Breedt, James Howard, Shankar Aswani, Val Byfield, Greg Duggan, Elethu Duna, Leo X. C. Dutra, Stewart D. Frusher, Elizabeth A. Fulton, Louise Gammage, Maria A. Gasalla, Chevon Griffiths, Almeida Guissamulo, Marcus Haward, Astrid Jarre, Sarah M. Jennings, Tia Jordan, Jessica Joyner, Narayana Kumar Ramani, Swathi Lekshmi Perumal Shanmugasundaram, Willem Malherbe, Kelly Ortega Cisneros, Adina Paytan, Gretta T. Pecl, Éva E. Plagányi, Ekaterina E. Popova, Haja Razafindrainibe, Michael Roberts, Prathiba Rohit, Shyam Salim Sainulabdeen, Warwick Sauer, Sathianandan Thayyil Valappil, Paryiappanal Ulahannan Zacharia, E. Ingrid van Putten

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 266 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 15%
Student > Master 29 11%
Other 15 6%
Student > Bachelor 14 5%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 69 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 71 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 16%
Social Sciences 22 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 80 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,046,088
of 26,239,416 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#100
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,723
of 311,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,239,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.