The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Public involvement in health outcomes research: lessons learnt from the development of the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12955-019-1123-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Grundy, Anju Devianee Keetharuth, Rosemary Barber, Jill Carlton, Janice Connell, Elizabeth Taylor Buck, Michael Barkham, Thomas Ricketts, Dan Robotham, Diana Rose, John Kay, Rob Hanlon, John Brazier |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 32% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 66% |
| Scientists | 16 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
| Psychology | 6 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 31 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,016,052
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#39
of 2,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,268
of 370,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.