↓ Skip to main content

Successful endovascular coil embolization of large pseudoaneurysm of ductus arteriosus diverticulum

Overview of attention for article published in CVIR Endovascular, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Successful endovascular coil embolization of large pseudoaneurysm of ductus arteriosus diverticulum
Published in
CVIR Endovascular, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s42155-019-0053-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Buechner, Veronica Lippuner, Kristine DeMaio, F. Daniel Donovan, Philip R. Weber, G. Phillip Schoettle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Other 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 80%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#18,016,017
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#281
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,177
of 351,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.