↓ Skip to main content

Successful endovascular coil embolization of large pseudoaneurysm of ductus arteriosus diverticulum

Overview of attention for article published in CVIR Endovascular, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Successful endovascular coil embolization of large pseudoaneurysm of ductus arteriosus diverticulum
Published in
CVIR Endovascular, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s42155-019-0053-5
Authors

David Buechner, Veronica Lippuner, Kristine DeMaio, F. Daniel Donovan, Philip R. Weber, G. Phillip Schoettle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,462,970
of 17,549,474 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#172
of 205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,354
of 277,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,549,474 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them