↓ Skip to main content

The evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete “fungi”

Overview of attention for article published in Protoplasma, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
273 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
369 Mendeley
Title
The evolutionary phylogeny of the oomycete “fungi”
Published in
Protoplasma, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00709-011-0269-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gordon W. Beakes, Sally L. Glockling, Satoshi Sekimoto

Abstract

Molecular sequencing has helped resolve the phylogenetic relationships amongst the diverse groups of algal, fungal-like and protist organisms that constitute the Chromalveolate "superkingdom" clade. It is thought that the whole clade evolved from a photosynthetic ancestor and that there have been at least three independent plastid losses during their evolutionary history. The fungal-like oomycetes and hyphochytrids, together with the marine flagellates Pirsonia and Developayella, form part of the clade defined by Cavalier-Smith and Chao (2006) as the phylum "Pseudofungi", which is a sister to the photosynthetic chromistan algae (phylum Ochrophyta). Within the oomycetes, a number of predominantly marine holocarpic genera appear to diverge before the main "saprolegnian" and "peronosporalean" lines, into which all oomycetes had been traditionally placed. It is now clear that oomycetes have their evolutionary roots in the sea. The earliest diverging oomycete genera so far documented, Eurychasma and Haptoglossa, are both obligate parasites that show a high degree of complexity and sophistication in their host parasite interactions and infection structures. Key morphological and cytological features of the oomycetes will be reviewed in the context of our revised understanding of their likely phylogeny. Recent genomic studies have revealed a number of intriguing similarities in host-pathogen interactions between the oomycetes with their distant apicocomplexan cousins. Therefore, the earlier view that oomycetes evolved from the largely saprotrophic "saprolegnian line" is not supported and current evidence shows these organisms evolved from simple holocarpic marine parasites. Both the hyphal-like pattern of growth and the acquisition of oogamous sexual reproduction probably developed largely after the migration of these organisms from the sea to land.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 351 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 19%
Researcher 60 16%
Student > Master 53 14%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 78 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 197 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 12%
Environmental Science 13 4%
Engineering 5 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 1%
Other 18 5%
Unknown 86 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,624,587
of 24,147,581 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#113
of 1,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,179
of 111,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,147,581 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,007 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them