| Title |
Centiloid scaling for quantification of brain amyloid with [18F]flutemetamol using multiple processing methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EJNMMI Research, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13550-018-0456-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark R. Battle, Lovena Chedumbarum Pillay, Val J. Lowe, David Knopman, Bradley Kemp, Christopher C. Rowe, Vincent Doré, Victor L. Villemagne, Christopher J. Buckley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 19 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,176,491
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Research
#8
of 564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,689
of 437,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Research
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 564 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.