↓ Skip to main content

Are quantum dots ready for in vivo imaging in human subjects?

Overview of attention for article published in Discover Nano, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Are quantum dots ready for in vivo imaging in human subjects?
Published in
Discover Nano, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11671-007-9061-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Weibo Cai, Andrew R Hsu, Zi-Bo Li, Xiaoyuan Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 135 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 24%
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Master 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 18%
Chemistry 22 16%
Materials Science 12 9%
Physics and Astronomy 12 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 35 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#538
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,339
of 83,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.