↓ Skip to main content

No difference in flexion power despite iliopsoas fatty degeneration in healed hip fractures with large lesser trochanter displacement

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
No difference in flexion power despite iliopsoas fatty degeneration in healed hip fractures with large lesser trochanter displacement
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00590-018-2200-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias Schenkel, Malwina Kaniewska, Tobias Bühler, Suzanne Anderson, Karim Eid

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#11,674,259
of 13,145,206 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#287
of 587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,323
of 252,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,145,206 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 587 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.