↓ Skip to main content

Do people with arthritis differ from healthy controls in their internal comparison standards for self-reports of health, fatigue, and pain?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Do people with arthritis differ from healthy controls in their internal comparison standards for self-reports of health, fatigue, and pain?
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41687-019-0108-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Doerte U. Junghaenel, Stefan Schneider, Arthur A. Stone

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 29%
Other 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Energy 1 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2019.
All research outputs
#9,050,231
of 15,519,312 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#86
of 187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,739
of 269,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,519,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 187 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them