| Title |
Interlaboratory comparison of size and surface charge measurements on nanoparticles prior to biological impact assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-011-0423-y |
| Authors |
G. Roebben, S. Ramirez-Garcia, V. A. Hackley, M. Roesslein, F. Klaessig, V. Kestens, I. Lynch, C. M. Garner, A. Rawle, A. Elder, V. L. Colvin, W. Kreyling, H. F. Krug, Z. A. Lewicka, S. McNeil, A. Nel, A. Patri, P. Wick, M. Wiesner, T. Xia, G. Oberdörster, K. A. Dawson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 26% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 17% |
| Engineering | 9 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#4,710,483
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#101
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,195
of 111,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.