↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of calcium–phosphorus (Ca/P) ratio as a new, accurate and inexpensive tool in the diagnosis of some Ca–P disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Reliability of calcium–phosphorus (Ca/P) ratio as a new, accurate and inexpensive tool in the diagnosis of some Ca–P disorders
Published in
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40618-019-01025-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Madeo, S. De Vincentis, E. Kara, F. Vescini, T. Trenti, G. Guaraldi, V. Rochira

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 67%
Unspecified 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#11,995,220
of 13,532,333 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
#707
of 846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,022
of 255,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,532,333 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.