The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Evidence for Using Bisphosphonate to Treat Legg‐Calvé‐Perthes Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-011-2240-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan L. Young, David G. Little, Harry K. W. Kim |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 27% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 67% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2024.
All research outputs
#5,794,980
of 26,609,881 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1,457
of 7,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,014
of 190,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#20
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,609,881 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.