↓ Skip to main content

Azores High and Hawaiian High: correlations, trends and shifts (1948–2018)

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical & Applied Climatology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Azores High and Hawaiian High: correlations, trends and shifts (1948–2018)
Published in
Theoretical & Applied Climatology, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00704-019-02837-5
Authors

Malgorzata Falarz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#11,981,381
of 13,516,274 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical & Applied Climatology
#831
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,674
of 252,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical & Applied Climatology
#40
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,516,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.