| Title |
Associations between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to reflect right ventricular function and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a SICS-I sub-study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0513-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Renske Wiersema, Jacqueline Koeze, Bart Hiemstra, Ville Pettilä, Anders Perner, Frederik Keus, Iwan C. C. van der Horst |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 26% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 21% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 32% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Librarian | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 63% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 14% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,179,840
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#428
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,497
of 367,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.