RT @TylerSbrt: Will start by looking at this study shared by @seanmcbride https://t.co/n66AhSYlJA, then will point out open questions and s…
Will start by looking at this study shared by @seanmcbride https://t.co/n66AhSYlJA, then will point out open questions and some reasons WB-MRI may be useful even if less sensitive than PSMA PET (very possible). 2/
Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. https://t.co/qfkACQYV3F
Well. https://t.co/0zgR5X3DK0
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @iThangasamy: Have you seen this @mj_robbo https://t.co/HVao9wFmVt
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
Have you seen this @mj_robbo
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
RT @DrMHofman: Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All le…
Prospective data showing massive difference between Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT and wb-MRI: 71% vs 39% per-patient sensitivity. All lesions seen on wb-MRI were detected by PSMA PET but not vice versa + superior diagnostic confidence with PET. https://t.co/fBeNVqP4hY
RT @fcounago: PSMA PET/CT is better than Body MRI in biochemical recurrence of prostate cáncer after RP https://t.co/LjFlQ93Q8T
RT @fcounago: PSMA PET/CT is better than Body MRI in biochemical recurrence of prostate cáncer after RP https://t.co/LjFlQ93Q8T
RT @fcounago: PSMA PET/CT is better than Body MRI in biochemical recurrence of prostate cáncer after RP https://t.co/LjFlQ93Q8T
RT @fcounago: PSMA PET/CT is better than Body MRI in biochemical recurrence of prostate cáncer after RP https://t.co/LjFlQ93Q8T
Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. https://t.co/CHC5LXx8HI