Title |
Untangling the relationship between fat distribution, nutritional status and Parkinson’s disease severity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s40520-019-01166-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria S. Pisciotta, Domenico Fusco, Giulia Grande, Vincenzo Brandi, Maria R. Lo Monaco, Alice Laudisio, Graziano Onder, Anna R. Bentivoglio, Diego Ricciardi, Roberto Bernabei, Giuseppe Zuccalà, Davide L. Vetrano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 20% |
Sweden | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 19% |
Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 22% |
Neuroscience | 6 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,526,423
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#1,122
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,914
of 365,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#33
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.