↓ Skip to main content

Relevance of induced and accidental hypothermia after trauma-haemorrhage–what do we know from experimental models in pigs?

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Relevance of induced and accidental hypothermia after trauma-haemorrhage–what do we know from experimental models in pigs?
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/2197-425x-2-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Hildebrand, Peter Radermacher, Steffen Ruchholtz, Markus Huber-Lang, Andreas Seekamp, Sascha Flohé, Martijn van Griensven, Hagen Andruszkow, Hans-Christoph Pape

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Romania 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,559,323
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#371
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,770
of 227,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.