Title |
A fault model of the 1995 Kobe earthquake derived from the GPS data on the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge and other datasets
|
---|---|
Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/bf03352173 |
Authors |
Kazuki Koketsu, Shingo Yoshida, Hiromichi Higashihara |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 37% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
Professor | 3 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 59% |
Engineering | 7 | 26% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#517
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,886
of 242,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#15
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.