| Title |
The spatial variability of actual evapotranspiration across the Amazon River Basin based on remote sensing products validated with flux towers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Processes, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13717-019-0158-8 |
| Authors |
Victor Hugo da Motta Paca, Gonzalo E. Espinoza-Dávalos, Tim M. Hessels, Daniel Medeiros Moreira, Georges F. Comair, Wim G. M. Bastiaanssen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 40 | 26% |
| Engineering | 22 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 44 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,861,562
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#44
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,790
of 485,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 485,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them