↓ Skip to main content

Intravenous hydrogen sulfide does not induce neuroprotection after aortic balloon occlusion-induced spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury in a human-like porcine model of ubiquitous arteriosclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous hydrogen sulfide does not induce neuroprotection after aortic balloon occlusion-induced spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury in a human-like porcine model of ubiquitous arteriosclerosis
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40635-018-0209-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andre Bredthauer, Karla Lehle, Angelika Scheuerle, Hubert Schelzig, Oscar McCook, Peter Radermacher, Csaba Szabo, Martin Wepler, Florian Simon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 10 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2019.
All research outputs
#20,556,243
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#371
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,800
of 350,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.