| Title |
Role of MRI in staging and follow-up of endometrial and cervical cancer: pitfalls and mimickers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-019-0696-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
María Milagros Otero-García, Alicia Mesa-Álvarez, Olivera Nikolic, Patricia Blanco-Lobato, Marijana Basta-Nikolic, Rafael Menéndez de Llano-Ortega, Laura Paredes-Velázquez, Nikola Nikolic, Magda Szewczyk-Bieda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 32% |
| Austria | 4 | 16% |
| Italy | 2 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Slovakia | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 201 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 75 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 81 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,521,275
of 24,804,602 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#65
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,622
of 458,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,804,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.