↓ Skip to main content

Life and death of Saccocoma tenella (Goldfuss)

Overview of attention for article published in Swiss Journal of Geosciences, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Life and death of Saccocoma tenella (Goldfuss)
Published in
Swiss Journal of Geosciences, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00015-011-0059-z
Authors

Hans Hess, Walter Etter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Other 2 15%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,804,836
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#52
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,621
of 112,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Swiss Journal of Geosciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them