↓ Skip to main content

The occlusion tests and end-expiratory esophageal pressure: measurements and comparison in controlled and assisted ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
The occlusion tests and end-expiratory esophageal pressure: measurements and comparison in controlled and assisted ventilation
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13613-016-0112-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Davide Chiumello, Dario Consonni, Silvia Coppola, Sara Froio, Francesco Crimella, Andrea Colombo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 15%
Student > Postgraduate 12 13%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Engineering 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,529,793
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#333
of 1,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,730
of 409,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.