↓ Skip to main content

ELL’s science meaning making in multimodal inquiry: a case-study in a Hong Kong bilingual school

Overview of attention for article published in Asia-Pacific Science Education, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
ELL’s science meaning making in multimodal inquiry: a case-study in a Hong Kong bilingual school
Published in
Asia-Pacific Science Education, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41029-019-0031-1
Authors

Melanie Williams, Kok-Sing Tang, Mihye Won

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Lecturer 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Master 5 7%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 37 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 16%
Linguistics 10 13%
Arts and Humanities 4 5%
Chemistry 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 37 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,009,288
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Asia-Pacific Science Education
#26
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,216
of 447,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia-Pacific Science Education
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one scored the same or higher as 18 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them