↓ Skip to main content

Implications of various effort-sharing approaches for national carbon budgets and emission pathways

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
56 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
Title
Implications of various effort-sharing approaches for national carbon budgets and emission pathways
Published in
Climatic Change, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02368-y
Authors

Nicole J. van den Berg, Heleen L. van Soest, Andries F. Hof, Michel G. J. den Elzen, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Wenying Chen, Laurent Drouet, Johannes Emmerling, Shinichiro Fujimori, Niklas Höhne, Alexandre C. Kõberle, David McCollum, Roberto Schaeffer, Swapnil Shekhar, Saritha Sudharmma Vishwanathan, Zoi Vrontisi, Kornelis Blok

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 313 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 16%
Student > Master 40 13%
Professor 14 4%
Student > Bachelor 14 4%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 91 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 60 19%
Energy 35 11%
Engineering 24 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19 6%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 113 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#456,855
of 26,080,506 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#234
of 6,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,828
of 462,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#2
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,080,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.