↓ Skip to main content

The role of feedback in morphological computation with compliant bodies

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The role of feedback in morphological computation with compliant bodies
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00422-012-0516-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helmut Hauser, Auke J. Ijspeert, Rudolf M. Füchslin, Rolf Pfeifer, Wolfgang Maass

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 86 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 30%
Student > Master 19 20%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Unspecified 8 8%
Other 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 44 45%
Computer Science 21 22%
Unspecified 13 13%
Physics and Astronomy 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 8 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,784,645
of 12,271,192 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#355
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,413
of 344,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,271,192 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them