| Title |
The role of feedback in morphological computation with compliant bodies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Cybernetics, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00422-012-0516-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helmut Hauser, Auke J. Ijspeert, Rudolf M. Füchslin, Rolf Pfeifer, Wolfgang Maass |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 66 | 45% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 16% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2021.
All research outputs
#14,708,659
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#490
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,381
of 169,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.