↓ Skip to main content

Gene Editing, Enhancing and Women’s Role

Overview of attention for article published in Science & Engineering Ethics, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Gene Editing, Enhancing and Women’s Role
Published in
Science & Engineering Ethics, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11948-017-9875-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frida Simonstein

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 33%
Student > Master 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Linguistics 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#10,614,435
of 13,333,056 outputs
Outputs from Science & Engineering Ethics
#578
of 676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,577
of 284,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science & Engineering Ethics
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,333,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.