3/ well this is cool - I found an open-access paper https://t.co/ALKrgZLd2W ... but the challenge for public-education is that the boundary between aerosolized + droplet transmission is "fuzzy" We need clear info, about the risks of breathing vs coughin
@dylanhmorris @jesse_kroll And this one for viruses other than flu: Tellier, R., Li, Y., Cowling, B.J., Tang, J.W., 2019. Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary. BMC Infect Dis 19, 101. https://t.co/IHH5Mm6Y4H
@NYTHealth Gold standard research https://t.co/XnV8TUlxv7
@nytimes 2019 Tellier et al. - Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary https://t.co/e2C1kasAKG Good discussion of SARS, MERS and why they might be transmitted by "aerosol" (whatever that truly means) but not as infective.
When speaking or coughing, large droplets are emitted and most fall to the floor within 1-2 meters while others stay in the air where their water content evaporates creating smaller and smaller droplets, the smallest (<5 um) are known as "droplet nuclei
This is a very interesting theory, and another important reason to #wearmasks.
@GHGGuru I certainly agree possible -- my Q is re 'likely.' Viz what % transmissions due to aerosols v fomites contaminated with droplets v direct contact (hand-shaking etc). Probably v difficult to know with certainty (as this article concludes) https://
RT @ACPCarnegie: @MaryBoustedNEU This paper supplies some clinical basis, due to LRT over URT disease site https://t.co/xDJncyAm9D WHO hav…
@MaryBoustedNEU This paper supplies some clinical basis, due to LRT over URT disease site https://t.co/xDJncyAm9D WHO have designated it as 'opportunistically airborne" P5 https://t.co/vsnEjPsU8S
@BatambuzeNassor @YLubowa @rggoobi Whether the novel corona virus is an aerosol virus (airborne) is still under debate: "two key properties of aerosols: a) their propensity to follow air flows, which requires a tight seal of the PPE around the airways". Pr
@radpaul @BSkylstad Check paper attached - LRT over URT indicates role droplet nuclei over droplets - @WHO designated ‘opportunistically airborne’ check severe acute respiratory infections treatment centre guidance p5 #SARS_COV_2 #SARSCoV2 #coronavirus ht
#Masks4All #masks #MasksNow increasing recognition of fine particle aerosols at close range or in confined spaces with poor airflow. https://t.co/GBVOLCBeCg
RT @AirSentryUK: Spread #Covid_19 between adults correctly following @CMO_England advice touch & droplet unlikely Paper below shows LRT sit…
RT @AirSentryUK: Dear @MattHancock is there any chance you could get someone to review this paper? Sincere belief we can reduce NHS staff…
Dear @MattHancock is there any chance you could get someone to review this paper? Sincere belief we can reduce NHS staff risk to near zero but have had no success getting through to central NHS / Government / @michaelgove or procurement #covid19 #coronav
@bbclaurak Could you consider highlighting this paper please Designates sars-cov as airborne due to lower respiratory tract route over upper, which is where droplet infection occurs #Covid_19 #covid19 #covid19UK #coronavirusuk #coronavirus #InfectiousDis
@sturdyAlex @Jazifer Keep following the rules and keep your house well aired sars-cov designated airborne due to lower respiratory infection path - main concern healthcare workers - social distancing ok inside as long as rooms are well aired See paper he
RT @AirSentryUK: This commentary paper from January 2019 designates Sars-Cov as an airborne infection due to its prime effect being in the…
Spread #Covid_19 between adults correctly following @CMO_England advice touch & droplet unlikely Paper below shows LRT site designates it airborne @BorisJohnson & @MattHancock may have contracted this via air transmission #covid19 #coranovirus #B
Actually there’s something quite important here ‘Invisible’ Droplet nuclei are invisible which is why sar-cov designated airborne disease,paper below, yet science keeps talking about visible droplets Come on Mr President-shake the tree,wake em up https:
RT @AirSentryUK: This commentary paper from January 2019 designates Sars-Cov as an airborne infection due to its prime effect being in the…
This commentary paper from January 2019 designates Sars-Cov as an airborne infection due to its prime effect being in the LRT & not URT, where droplet infections normally commence This must be addressed #COVID19 #coronavirus #infectioncontrol #NHSher
@Luciddestiny @TeslaOwnersUK Thanks Warren - I'm not sure he will ever see it but you never know ;o) @elonmusk This paper designates Sars-Cov as airborne, it is almost certainly why so many staff are catching https://t.co/Zg7Caq9CKN
@enemico "We find that aerosol transmission accounts for approximately half of all transmission events. " - for influenza A. https://t.co/2PtIkOAJ3B Also see https://t.co/qtrXgsmlIP Turns out the aereosol/droplet transmission discussion has been ongoi
@seanjtaylor A lot of national labs study the physics of this type of thing. There are many published papers using tracer gas, inert particles, or inactive agents. A quick search turned up this: https://t.co/DVBjNJbnJ3
A nice review here on aerosol transmission: Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary https://t.co/1ro1B4iRqb
RT @Saundraharbiso2: Aerosol Infectious Diseases https://t.co/fp1UyCaOj5
Aerosol Infectious Diseases https://t.co/fp1UyCaOj5
@FionaHillsCat1 @focused4USA @JamesLindholm1 🙏 🤔. I just pulled this up 👇& quickly scanned it but ima need a cup a tea ☕️ 2 process. I did get that a 🦠 transmitted via aerosol requires N95 masks as opposed to a surgical mask level requirement. I’m home
RT @RogueShoeButler: @Laurie_Garrett @WHO I understand "aerosols" to include droplets. This terminology is so confusing! Judging by this pa…
@dikaioslin Please stop giving advice as an elderly. Flu is airborne (aerosol) and there is no evidence/publication at all for Wuhan virus. Here is a review paper on terminology: https://t.co/lTlIMc5x8d and the on flu:https://t.co/dM81DWd9Ur
@JustSayin_Yo @JackSlater__ You can try washing your mouth out with soap too. Maybe that can help https://t.co/g8YlVLVRxs
RT @RogueShoeButler: @Laurie_Garrett @WHO I understand "aerosols" to include droplets. This terminology is so confusing! Judging by this pa…
@Laurie_Garrett @WHO I understand "aerosols" to include droplets. This terminology is so confusing! Judging by this paper, I'm not the only one who thinks so: https://t.co/1EZgtfyvKZ
@Andrews86495144 @stewartboyle4 @Channel4News If you were interested in geeking out on the dynamics of airborne vs. droplet transmission (given the lockdown, I'm sure there is little more exciting on a Friday night), this source gives a little explanation:
Further information re airborne transmission https://t.co/A655kUYjqd It would be helpful to know if coronavirus infection severity varies with probable route of spread touch vs inhalation via epidemiological studies. Understand epidemiological study value
RT @linseymarr: Another good article about why the "potential for aerosol transmission may be underestimated" https://t.co/dVmRk6o3Ey by Te…
RT @linseymarr: Another good article about why the "potential for aerosol transmission may be underestimated" https://t.co/dVmRk6o3Ey by Te…
RT @linseymarr: Another good article about why the "potential for aerosol transmission may be underestimated" https://t.co/dVmRk6o3Ey by Te…
RT @linseymarr: Another good article about why the "potential for aerosol transmission may be underestimated" https://t.co/dVmRk6o3Ey by Te…
RT @linseymarr: Another good article about why the "potential for aerosol transmission may be underestimated" https://t.co/dVmRk6o3Ey by Te…
RT @linseymarr: Another good article about why the "potential for aerosol transmission may be underestimated" https://t.co/dVmRk6o3Ey by Te…
RT @linseymarr: Another good article about why the "potential for aerosol transmission may be underestimated" https://t.co/dVmRk6o3Ey by Te…
RT @linseymarr: Another good article about why the "potential for aerosol transmission may be underestimated" https://t.co/dVmRk6o3Ey by Te…
RT @linseymarr: Another good article about why the "potential for aerosol transmission may be underestimated" https://t.co/dVmRk6o3Ey by Te…
Another good article about why the "potential for aerosol transmission may be underestimated" https://t.co/dVmRk6o3Ey by Tellier, Li, @bencowling88, Tang https://t.co/ZqMvP6n6Ej
@GovInslee @waEMD Seattle Central College ignores risks. IN PERSON lab classes start April 13. Infects families! Aerosolized virus in class, halls, bathrooms. Delay ALL in person! @SeattleCentral @NorthSeaCollege @EdwardsLange @SouthSeattleCC @WADeptHealth
@roosvonk @Namjri houd een veilige afstand, er wordt uitgegaan van 2m net als griep van varicella (waterpokken) is bekend dat het tientallen meters door de lucht kan reizen, of het hiermee vergelijkbaar is, is niet onderzocht https://t.co/o1Sw8ssOlE
@aalkermd @soledadobrien @PeterHotez @aalkermd Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary https://t.co/IvBjIBxT2M
#nanotechnology #Biotech Is a nanoparticulate airborne viral vector a factor in the #Covid19 #Pandemic ? #geoengineering See: hydrogels/polymers for sustained delivery of viral vectors #Vaccine #chemtrails https://t.co/Lu0Q6JpRR0
@abdelaziz_saad @bataleh Yes you are right, read the article! and this also may help you understand what aerosol route mean. https://t.co/2gki0bVmNR
@AbuAlhassan44 @Alsamhouri Go to basics and read this please, if it would make a difference to you : https://t.co/2gki0bVmNR
@smith796000 前にも送ったけど、これも読んでエアロゾル感染の定義がどのように論文で利用されているのかもう一回勉強しろ。 あ、英語の勉強が先かな?南無阿弥陀仏 感染性病原体のエアロゾル伝播の認識:解説 https://t.co/0xFX5Q4eea
RT @SakamotoFumie: エアロゾルが話題になっているようですが、エアロゾルは相対的な用語で、明確な定義はありません。 つまり粒子径>20 μmの大きな粒も、<5μmの小さな粒もエアロゾルと呼ばれることがあります。エアロゾルの意味について知りたい方は↓の論文をどう…
@meta_fact @Vaccinologist So.. what you think about this: https://t.co/Ynexs6zYnw @linseymarr researches https://t.co/a5wmj7zP4d https://t.co/DrSN4nb9A0 https://t.co/31QfOtBRfL
@apps_andy @TheBMA @Channel4News I'm currently wading through this: https://t.co/dDSoB0qEZd but my tired brain needs sleep.
RT @patarchambault: Revue intéressante pour la transmission de certains agents infectieux par aérosols https://t.co/2grLfik3xB @FMSQ @cisss…
Revue intéressante pour la transmission de certains agents infectieux par aérosols https://t.co/2grLfik3xB @FMSQ @cisssca12 #COVID19
N95 respirator (face mask) can protect you. https://t.co/hbMJwecLxp https://t.co/BEAz0f5JsC https://t.co/T7yw99kp3f
I've read enough to assume that #Coronavirus can be transmitted via aerosolization, especially in confined spaces like elevators. This is an interesting article on long/short-range airborne droplet routes & relation to ambient airflow. https://t.co/k4Y
@aetiology @guacamolebio @KenVaughanSoc @love2laugh4ever Tara refs 39-42 may be instructive https://t.co/McfVmFNvtb.
RT @JohnSmi21518540: @MackayIM @owenmp @pwginsburg @profvrr @greg_folkers @Columbia I found this. https://t.co/Ynexs6zYnw
@MackayIM @owenmp @pwginsburg @profvrr @greg_folkers @Columbia I found this. https://t.co/Ynexs6zYnw
RT @richykirsh: @kaimatai @Nicks2007mom Not sure I agree with the assumption that it is transmitted by droplet. There is a bunch of evidenc…
RT @fangshimin: 想知道什么叫气溶胶传播,又懂英文的,这里有一篇最新综述可以看,别听墙内专家的不懂装懂、胡说八道。另,那个儿科医生找了指南说“空气传播”有明确定义来反驳我,那个定义就是我说的它有时被等同于气溶胶传播,但有时它又泛指飞沫传播和气溶胶传播,该综述也指出…
@kaimatai @Nicks2007mom Not sure I agree with the assumption that it is transmitted by droplet. There is a bunch of evidence that it could be spread by aerosol. Refs 39-42 are most rel. https://t.co/McfVmFNvtb
This is my favourite picture of my trawl. https://t.co/A6Dp3igDYl
RT @sethdjudson: #Aerosols are particles in air, and many divide them into small and large #droplets. Small droplets transmission is often…
@Robert4787 Aerosolized means weaponized imho https://t.co/2OPbVGpJ4I
@Thom_Hartmann Aerosolized can also mean weaponized. https://t.co/2OPbVG87G8
@lisapease Aerosolized for all intents can also mean weaponized. https://t.co/2OPbVG87G8
RT @glbryson: Droplet transmission is suspected for coronavirus. N95 masks required to prevent aerosol transmission (and aerosol generating…
Droplet transmission is suspected for coronavirus. N95 masks required to prevent aerosol transmission (and aerosol generating procedures like intubation). Know the difference. https://t.co/lhGbQchlFS
RT @dawso007: Airborne transmission of viruses: https://t.co/gK7kyQDEGN
RT @dawso007: Airborne transmission of viruses: https://t.co/gK7kyQDEGN
Airborne transmission of viruses: https://t.co/gK7kyQDEGN
RT @Ron_George: Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents https://t.co/BjsupCipE4 #COVID19 https://t.co/22ZydUtGew
RT @Ron_George: Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents https://t.co/BjsupCipE4 #COVID19 https://t.co/22ZydUtGew
Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents https://t.co/BjsupCipE4 #COVID19 https://t.co/22ZydUtGew
用老方的茅攻老方的茅🐂
@Just_Eleanora China has disclosed over 1700 cases of COVID-19 among health care workers. It doesn't make sense to me that no one is investigating the droplet size necessary for infection since it has obvious implications for PPE requirements. I found this
RT @Nathankirinoha: 感染症における「エアロゾル伝播」について、どのような用語法が用いられているのか網羅的に示してる論文。 海外での文脈なので、日本における用語法と異なる面が沢山出てくる。 要するに「定義なし」で混沌としてるのが現状。 https://t.…
RT @Nathankirinoha: 感染症における「エアロゾル伝播」について、どのような用語法が用いられているのか網羅的に示してる論文。 海外での文脈なので、日本における用語法と異なる面が沢山出てくる。 要するに「定義なし」で混沌としてるのが現状。 https://t.…
RT @Nathankirinoha: 感染症における「エアロゾル伝播」について、どのような用語法が用いられているのか網羅的に示してる論文。 海外での文脈なので、日本における用語法と異なる面が沢山出てくる。 要するに「定義なし」で混沌としてるのが現状。 https://t.…
RT @Nathankirinoha: 感染症における「エアロゾル伝播」について、どのような用語法が用いられているのか網羅的に示してる論文。 海外での文脈なので、日本における用語法と異なる面が沢山出てくる。 要するに「定義なし」で混沌としてるのが現状。 https://t.…
RT @Nathankirinoha: 感染症における「エアロゾル伝播」について、どのような用語法が用いられているのか網羅的に示してる論文。 海外での文脈なので、日本における用語法と異なる面が沢山出てくる。 要するに「定義なし」で混沌としてるのが現状。 https://t.…
RT @Nathankirinoha: 感染症における「エアロゾル伝播」について、どのような用語法が用いられているのか網羅的に示してる論文。 海外での文脈なので、日本における用語法と異なる面が沢山出てくる。 要するに「定義なし」で混沌としてるのが現状。 https://t.…
RT @theyokohamalife: @Nixy77420143 That depends on a lot of factors like how much airflow and movement there is. Here’s a recent study I ju…