Title |
An ecosystem approach to restoration and sustainable management of dry forest in southern Peru
|
---|---|
Published in |
Kew Bulletin, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12225-010-9235-y |
Authors |
Oliver Q. Whaley, David G. Beresford-Jones, William Milliken, Alfonso Orellana, Anna Smyk, Joaquín Leguía |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 162 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 29 | 18% |
Student > Master | 26 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 15% |
Unknown | 35 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 49 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
Engineering | 5 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 4% |
Unknown | 41 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Kew Bulletin
#256
of 1,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,475
of 182,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kew Bulletin
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,093 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.