↓ Skip to main content

Adhesive wear mechanisms uncovered by atomistic simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Friction, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Adhesive wear mechanisms uncovered by atomistic simulations
Published in
Friction, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40544-018-0234-6
Authors

Jean-François Molinari, Ramin Aghababaei, Tobias Brink, Lucas Frérot, Enrico Milanese

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 50%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 56%
Unspecified 4 22%
Materials Science 3 17%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,167,052
of 13,538,736 outputs
Outputs from Friction
#31
of 78 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,302
of 292,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Friction
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,538,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 78 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.