Title |
Status quo of chemical weed control in rice in sub-Saharan Africa
|
---|---|
Published in |
Food Security, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12571-018-0878-0 |
Authors |
Jonne Rodenburg, Jean-Martial Johnson, Ibnou Dieng, Kalimuthu Senthilkumar, Elke Vandamme, Cyriaque Akakpo, Moundibaye Dastre Allarangaye, Idriss Baggie, Samuel Oladele Bakare, Ralph Kwame Bam, Ibrahim Bassoro, Bayuh Belay Abera, Madiama Cisse, Wilson Dogbe, Henri Gbakatchétché, Famara Jaiteh, Geophrey Jasper Kajiru, Alain Kalisa, Nianankoro Kamissoko, Keita Sékou, Ahouanton Kokou, Delphine Mapiemfu-Lamare, Fanny Mabone Lunze, Jerome Mghase, Illiassou Mossi Maïga, David Nanfumba, Abibou Niang, Raymond Rabeson, Zacharie Segda, Fitta Silas Sillo, Atsuko Tanaka, Kazuki Saito |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
Kenya | 2 | 18% |
Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
India | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
Researcher | 13 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 22 | 16% |
Unknown | 50 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
Other | 26 | 19% |
Unknown | 57 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,574,866
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Food Security
#119
of 748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,602
of 439,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Security
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.