| Title |
Experts’ guidelines of intubation and extubation of the ICU patient of French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) and French-speaking Intensive Care Society (SRLF)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0483-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hervé Quintard, Erwan l’Her, Julien Pottecher, Frédéric Adnet, Jean-Michel Constantin, Audrey De Jong, Pierre Diemunsch, Rose Fesseau, Anne Freynet, Christophe Girault, Christophe Guitton, Yann Hamonic, Eric Maury, Armand Mekontso-Dessap, Fabrice Michel, Paul Nolent, Sébastien Perbet, Gwenael Prat, Antoine Roquilly, Karim Tazarourte, Nicolas Terzi, Arnaud W. Thille, Mikael Alves, Etienne Gayat, Laurence Donetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 25 | 19% |
| Spain | 12 | 9% |
| Colombia | 7 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 117 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 5% |
| Scientists | 6 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 21% |
| Unknown | 49 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | <1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 54 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#495,884
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#45
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,268
of 449,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.