↓ Skip to main content

Major gaps in the distribution of protected areas for threatened and narrow range Afrotropical plants

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity & Conservation, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Major gaps in the distribution of protected areas for threatened and narrow range Afrotropical plants
Published in
Biodiversity & Conservation, July 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10531-004-1299-2
Authors

Neil Burgess, Wolfgang KÜper, Jens Mutke, Joanna Brown, Sally Westaway, Susie Turpie, Charles Meshack, James Taplin, Colin McClean, Jon C. Lovett

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 5 4%
United Kingdom 4 3%
Australia 2 1%
Thailand 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 111 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Student > Master 19 14%
Other 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 47%
Environmental Science 56 41%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 3 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2007.
All research outputs
#1,576,492
of 6,778,194 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity & Conservation
#311
of 808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,617
of 315,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity & Conservation
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,778,194 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.