| Title |
Major gaps in the distribution of protected areas for threatened and narrow range Afrotropical plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-004-1299-2 |
| Authors |
Neil Burgess, Wolfgang KÜper, Jens Mutke, Joanna Brown, Sally Westaway, Susie Turpie, Charles Meshack, James Taplin, Colin McClean, Jon C. Lovett |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Thailand | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 141 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 69 | 42% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2008.
All research outputs
#5,256,565
of 24,739,153 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#782
of 2,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,985
of 65,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,739,153 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.