The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Political Behavior, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11109-019-09528-x |
| Authors |
Brendan Nyhan, Ethan Porter, Jason Reifler, Thomas J. Wood |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 30% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 54 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 64% |
| Scientists | 26 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 248 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 21% |
| Unknown | 70 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 96 | 39% |
| Psychology | 27 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 79 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 231. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#177,188
of 26,329,759 outputs
Outputs from Political Behavior
#26
of 893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,594
of 452,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Behavior
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,329,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.