| Title |
From Paper to Podium: Quantifying the Translational Potential of Performance Nutrition Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-018-1005-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Graeme L. Close, Andreas M. Kasper, James P. Morton |
| Abstract |
Sport nutrition is one of the fastest growing and evolving disciplines of sport and exercise science, demonstrated by a 4-fold increase in the number of research papers between 2012 and 2018. Indeed, the scope of contemporary nutrition-related research could range from discovery of novel nutrient-sensitive cell-signalling pathways to the assessment of the effects of sports drinks on exercise performance. For the sport nutrition practitioner, the goal is to translate innovations in research to develop and administer practical interventions that contribute to the delivery of winning performances. Accordingly, step one in the translation of research to practice should always be a well-structured critique of the translational potential of the existing scientific evidence. To this end, we present an operational framework (the "Paper-2-Podium Matrix") that provides a checklist of criteria for which to prompt the critical evaluation of performance nutrition-related research papers. In considering the (1) research context, (2) participant characteristics, (3) research design, (4) dietary and exercise controls, (5) validity and reliability of exercise performance tests, (6) data analytics, (7) feasibility of application, (8) risk/reward and (9) timing of the intervention, we aimed to provide a time-efficient framework to aid practitioners in their scientific appraisal of research. Ultimately, it is the combination of boldness of reform (i.e. innovations in research) and quality of execution (i.e. ease of administration of practical solutions) that is most likely to deliver the transition from paper to podium. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 306 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 86 | 28% |
| United States | 23 | 8% |
| Australia | 9 | 3% |
| Ireland | 8 | 3% |
| Spain | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Japan | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Unknown | 134 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 150 | 49% |
| Scientists | 82 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 68 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 252 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 8% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 17% |
| Unknown | 73 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 88 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 75 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 213. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#190,844
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#182
of 2,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,955
of 450,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.