↓ Skip to main content

Video Tracking Using Dual-Tree Wavelet Polar Matching and Rao-Blackwellised Particle Filter

Overview of attention for article published in ADS, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Video Tracking Using Dual-Tree Wavelet Polar Matching and Rao-Blackwellised Particle Filter
Published in
ADS, February 2010
DOI 10.1155/2009/620404
Authors

Sze Kim Pang, James D.B. Nelson, Simon J. Godsill, Nick Kingsbury

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 17%
Unknown 5 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 33%
Environmental Science 1 17%
Physics and Astronomy 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#7,327
of 25,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,551
of 102,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#61
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.