Title |
Predicting mortality in patients undergoing VA-ECMO after coronary artery bypass grafting: the REMEMBER score
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2307-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Liangshan Wang, Feng Yang, Xiaomeng Wang, Haixiu Xie, Eddy Fan, Mark Ogino, Daniel Brodie, Hong Wang, Xiaotong Hou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 14% |
Spain | 5 | 14% |
Mexico | 3 | 8% |
Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Germany | 2 | 6% |
Italy | 2 | 6% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 61% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Scientists | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 14 | 18% |
Researcher | 12 | 15% |
Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 60% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 22 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,863,446
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,665
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,907
of 445,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#35
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.