↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Surgery International, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00383-019-04435-y
Authors

Ilan Z. Kafka, Stanislav Kocherov, Jawdat Jaber, Boris Chertin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Other 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Computer Science 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#11,529,653
of 12,974,522 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Surgery International
#465
of 721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,998
of 266,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Surgery International
#20
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,974,522 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 721 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.