↓ Skip to main content

Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12884-018-2168-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Cernat, Chante De Freitas, Umair Majid, Forum Trivedi, Caroline Higgins, Meredith Vanstone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Researcher 14 7%
Other 10 5%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 82 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Psychology 5 2%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 89 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,202,023
of 25,936,091 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#874
of 4,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,253
of 449,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#30
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,936,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.