↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrobiologia, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Hydrobiologia, January 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1021038916271
Authors

S.J. de Groot

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 4%
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 49 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 33%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Other 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 58%
Environmental Science 14 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,821,366
of 12,978,017 outputs
Outputs from Hydrobiologia
#461
of 2,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,322
of 312,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrobiologia
#19
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,978,017 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.