The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
The efficacy of ginseng. A systematic review of randomised clinical trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, October 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002280050674 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
B. K. Vogler, M. H. Pittler, E. Ernst |
| Abstract |
Ginseng is one of the most popular herbal remedies, and a number of health claims are made for it. This systematic review provides an evaluation of the current evidence for or against the efficacy of ginseng root extract. Searches of the computerised literature databases Medline, Embase, Biosis, CISCOM and the Cochrane Library were performed to retrieve double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials of ginseng root extract for any indication. Manufacturers and experts were contacted to provide additional information. There were no restrictions regarding the language of publication. The outcome and methodological quality of all trials were independently assessed by two reviewers. Sixteen trials met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. These trials related to physical performance, psychomotor performance and cognitive function, immunomodulation, diabetes mellitus and herpes simplex type-II infections. The evidence found for ginseng root extract is compelling for none of these indications. Based on these data, it is concluded that the efficacy of ginseng root extract is not established beyond reasonable doubt for any of these indications. The widespread use of ginseng as a herbal remedy warrants more rigorous investigations to assess its efficacy and safety. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 24% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,988,326
of 26,187,546 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#344
of 2,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,859
of 34,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,187,546 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them