↓ Skip to main content

Client Perceptions of Reported Outcomes of Group Model Building in the New Zealand Public Sector

Overview of attention for article published in Group Decision & Negotiation, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Client Perceptions of Reported Outcomes of Group Model Building in the New Zealand Public Sector
Published in
Group Decision & Negotiation, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10726-015-9433-y
Authors

Rodney J. Scott, Robert Y. Cavana, Donald Cameron

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 33%
Unspecified 6 29%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 9 43%
Unspecified 7 33%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Energy 1 5%
Other 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2016.
All research outputs
#9,839,008
of 12,320,043 outputs
Outputs from Group Decision & Negotiation
#63
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,079
of 344,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Group Decision & Negotiation
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,320,043 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.