Title |
Seismic vulnerability functions for Australian buildings by using GEM empirical vulnerability assessment guidelines
|
---|---|
Published in |
Natural Hazards, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11069-015-2042-x |
Authors |
Tariq Maqsood, Mark Edwards, Ioanna Ioannou, Ioannis Kosmidis, Tiziana Rossetto, Neil Corby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 11 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,236,662
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#739
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,028
of 282,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#17
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.