↓ Skip to main content

Use of local anesthesia in ear surgery: technique, modifications, advantages, and limitations over 30 years’ experience

Overview of attention for article published in The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Use of local anesthesia in ear surgery: technique, modifications, advantages, and limitations over 30 years’ experience
Published in
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, July 2016
DOI 10.4103/1012-5574.186541
Authors

Mohamed A. El-Begermy, Marwa M. El-Begermy, Amr N. Rabie, Abdelrahman E. M. Ezzat, Ahmed A. Kader Sheesh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Other 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 86%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2018.
All research outputs
#18,661,637
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
#34
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,021
of 364,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.