| Title |
Adsorption capacities and related characteristics of wood charcoals carbonized using a one-step or two-step process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, February 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00776645 |
| Authors |
Lilibeth Pulido-Novicio, Toshimitsu Hata, Yasuji Kurimoto, Shuichi Doi, Shigehisa Ishihara, Yuji Imamura |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 19% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 15 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#252
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,896
of 116,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them