| Title |
Effect on comfort of administering bubble-humidified or dry oxygen: the Oxyrea non-inferiority randomized study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-018-0472-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurent Poiroux, Lise Piquilloud, Valérie Seegers, Cyril Le Roy, Karine Colonval, Carole Agasse, Vanessa Zinzoni, Vanessa Hodebert, Alexandre Cambonie, Josselin Saletes, Irma Bourgeon, François Beloncle, Alain Mercat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 18 | 30% |
| Spain | 8 | 13% |
| Colombia | 3 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Antigua and Barbuda | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#937,975
of 25,389,520 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#102
of 1,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,742
of 419,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#2
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.