Title |
The IllustrisTNG simulations: public data release
|
---|---|
Published in |
Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40668-019-0028-x |
Authors |
Dylan Nelson, Volker Springel, Annalisa Pillepich, Vicente Rodriguez-Gomez, Paul Torrey, Shy Genel, Mark Vogelsberger, Ruediger Pakmor, Federico Marinacci, Rainer Weinberger, Luke Kelley, Mark Lovell, Benedikt Diemer, Lars Hernquist |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 186 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 31% |
Researcher | 31 | 17% |
Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 3% |
Other | 21 | 11% |
Unknown | 38 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 139 | 75% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
Engineering | 2 | 1% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 37 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,852,754
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology
#17
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,753
of 369,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.