↓ Skip to main content

Thematic analysis of aid workers’ stressors and coping strategies: work, psychological, lifestyle and social dimensions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Humanitarian Action, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Thematic analysis of aid workers’ stressors and coping strategies: work, psychological, lifestyle and social dimensions
Published in
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41018-018-0046-3
Authors

Tarli K. H. Young, Kenneth I. Pakenham, Michael F. Norwood

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 23%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 35%
Social Sciences 11 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,237,313
of 19,044,106 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#25
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,410
of 406,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,044,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.