| Title |
Infrainguinal inflow assessment and endovenous stent placement in iliofemoral post-thrombotic obstructions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CVIR Endovascular, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42155-018-0038-9 |
| Authors |
Ole Grøtta, Tone Enden, Gunnar Sandbæk, Gard Filip Gjerdalen, Carl-Erik Slagsvold, Dag Bay, Nils-Einar Kløw, Antonio Rosales |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saint Martin (French part) | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2020.
All research outputs
#13,115,587
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from CVIR Endovascular
#142
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,116
of 310,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CVIR Endovascular
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.