↓ Skip to main content

Sustained low efficiency dialysis should not be interrupted for performing transpulmonary thermodilution measurements

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Sustained low efficiency dialysis should not be interrupted for performing transpulmonary thermodilution measurements
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13613-018-0455-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefanie Geith, Lynne Stecher, Christian Rabe, Stefan Sack, Florian Eyer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2019.
All research outputs
#17,998,897
of 23,116,036 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#894
of 1,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,753
of 437,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#27
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,116,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.