| Title |
Evaluation of dysphagia in different phenotypes of early and idiopathic Parkinsonism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41983-018-0031-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Al-Amir Bassiouny Mohamed, Gharib Fawi Mohamed, Hassan Mohamed Elnady, Mohamed Abdelmoneim Sayed, Ahmed Mamdouh Imam, Megahed Mohamed Hassan, Sherihan Rezk Ahmed |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
#30
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,092
of 361,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.